How many law firms use AudioEye?

535 personal injury law firms use AudioEye, representing 1.5% adoption across the PI legal market. Firms using AudioEye average a 41.9 Sophistication Index score, +13.4 points above non-adopters.

Why do law firms use AudioEye?

AudioEye is a accessibility tool. Personal injury law firms adopt AudioEye to improve their technology stack and competitive position in the PI legal market.

Which law firms use AudioEye?

Top personal injury law firms using AudioEye include Aljouny Injury Law, B A L | Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP & axley.com. These firms are ranked by technology sophistication across 37,000+ PI firms nationally.

AudioEye for Law Firms — 535 PI Firms (1.5% Adoption)

What is AudioEye?

AudioEye provides digital accessibility solutions including automated scanning, remediation, and an assistive technology toolbar. It distinguishes itself by combining automated platform scanning with human-assisted AI remediation. However, AudioEye still shares the fundamental overlay controversy that affects all overlay-based accessibility solutions.

Common Use Cases for Law Firms

Monitor and remediate accessibility issues across the firm's website
Provide an assistive technology toolbar for visitors with disabilities
Generate VPAT and accessibility compliance documentation
Reduce legal liability from ADA website accessibility claims

How We Detect It

JavaScript toolbar overlay Automated remediation layer Requires AudioEye subscription

Market Overview

Among personal injury law firms, AudioEye has been adopted by 535 firms (1.5% adoption rate) as a accessibility solution. Adopters score 41.9 SI on average, +13.4 points higher than firms without it, suggesting AudioEye correlates with broader technology investment. The heaviest adoption comes from the Awareness Leaders segment (17.1%), followed by Awareness-Only Firms (0.7%). The most common co-occurring tools are Facebook Pixel (found on 91.0% of AudioEye adopters) and Google Analytics (65.2%).

AudioEye Quick Facts

Company

Headquarters Tucson, AZ

Market

Category Accessibility

Subcategory ADA/WCAG Compliance Platform

Pricing Subscription · Free tier

Competitors accessiBe, Siteimprove, Level Access

Trend ▲ Growing

131,000+ Customers

37/55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria tested automatically

50% Issues fixed automatically

400% More protection from legal claims vs competitors

Why PI Firms Use AudioEye

PI firms use AudioEye to ensure their marketing-heavy websites comply with ADA and WCAG standards, avoiding lawsuits from accessibility complaints that could arise from contact forms, live chat, or image-heavy content. It improves client intake and user experience for visitors with disabilities, potentially boosting SEO and conversions by making sites more inclusive. Automated fixes and monitoring maintain compliance as sites update with new case intake forms or SEO content.

Sources: audioeye.com/post/audioeye-advan... audioeye.com/solution/all-features/ support.duda.co/hc/en-us/article... audioeye.com/lp/ada-web-complian...

535 Firms Using

1.5% Adoption Rate

41.9 Avg Adopter SI

+13.4 SI Lift vs Non-Adopters

Get connected

Request an introduction from Top Dog Law — we'll make the connection on your behalf.

Adoption by State

ME —

VT —

NH —

WA —

MT —

ND —

MN —

WI —

MI —

NY —

MA —

RI —

OR —

ID —

WY —

SD —

IA —

IL —

IN —

OH —

PA —

NJ —

CT —

CA —

NV —

CO —

NE —

MO —

KY —

WV —

VA —

MD —

DE —

DC —

AZ —

UT —

KS —

AR —

TN —

NC —

SC —

NM —

OK —

LA —

MS —

AL —

GA —

AK —

HI —

TX —

FL —

0

—

Adoption by Segment which segments use AudioEye most

Awareness Leaders

420 17.1% Awareness-Only Firms

52 0.7% Basic Tech Adopters

25 0.4% Retention Innovators

15 0.8% Conversion-Focused Firms

12 0.2% Minimalist Tech Users

10 0.1% Engagement Specialists

1 0.0%

Commonly Paired With co-occurrence

Facebook Pixel 91.0%

Google Analytics 65.2%

Google Tag Manager 62.1%

Scorpion 58.9%

Microsoft 365 53.6%

Google Workspace 32.3%

Simpli.fi 26.0%

Hibu 19.1%

Google reCAPTCHA 7.3%

Bing Ads 7.1%

Yext 6.7%

Google Reviews Widget 3.0%

WordPress 2.8%

YouTube 1.7%

Barracuda 1.7%

AudioEye Best Practices

1

Treat overlays as a stopgap, not a solution. AudioEye's toolbar helps visitors with disabilities RIGHT NOW, but it doesn't fix the underlying HTML. The National Federation of the Blind has formally opposed overlay-only approaches. Use AudioEye for immediate coverage while investing in structural accessibility fixes.

2

Run an accessibility audit BEFORE installing any overlay. Know what's actually broken first. Many firms install AudioEye because someone scared them about an ADA lawsuit, without understanding that 80% of their issues are simple fixes — missing alt text on images, unlabeled form fields, poor color contrast. Fix those manually and the overlay has less to compensate for.

3

Keep your accessibility statement current and honest. AudioEye generates compliance documentation, but don't just set it and forget it. Update it quarterly with what you've fixed, what you're working on, and how visitors can request accommodations. Courts look favorably on firms that demonstrate ongoing good-faith effort.

4

Test with actual assistive technology, not just the audit score. Install NVDA (free screen reader) and try to navigate your own site. Can you find the phone number? Can you submit the contact form? An audit score of 95% means nothing if a blind visitor can't actually contact your firm.

5

Pay attention to PDF accessibility. Many PI firms post retainer agreements, case results, and guides as PDFs — and they're almost never accessible. AudioEye doesn't fix PDFs. Use Adobe Acrobat's accessibility checker or hire a remediation service for your most critical documents.

Alternatives to AudioEye

1

accessiBe — Cheaper automated overlay, but the FTC fined them $1 million in January 2025 for deceptive WCAG compliance claims. If you're a law firm, using a vendor that was fined for misrepresenting compliance is a bad look. Proceed with caution.

2

UserWay — Similar overlay approach with a visible accessibility widget. More affordable than AudioEye. Same fundamental limitation: overlays modify the presentation layer, not the source code. UserWay is transparent about this and positions itself as one part of a broader strategy.

3

Manual WCAG remediation — Hire an accessibility consultant to fix your actual HTML/CSS. More expensive upfront ($3K-$10K for a typical firm website) but produces genuinely accessible markup that doesn't depend on a third-party script loading correctly. This is the approach that actually holds up if you're ever sued.

4

Siteimprove — Enterprise accessibility monitoring platform that finds issues but doesn't try to auto-fix them with an overlay. Better for firms that want to fix things properly over time rather than paper over problems with JavaScript.

AudioEye Power Moves

1

Use accessibility improvements as a competitive moat. ADA lawsuits against law firm websites are increasing. If your site is genuinely accessible and your competitors' aren't, you're not only protected legally — you're capturing clients with disabilities that your competitors literally cannot serve. 26% of US adults have some form of disability.

2

Check your competitor's accessibility and mention it in pitches. Run a free WAVE audit (wave.webaim.org) on competing firms' sites. If their contact form is inaccessible and yours works perfectly with a screen reader, that's a differentiator worth mentioning when a prospect is comparing firms.

3

Add accessibility as a line item in your marketing RFP. When hiring a web design agency, require WCAG 2.1 AA compliance as a deliverable — tested with screen readers, not just an automated scan. Agencies that can't deliver this aren't worth hiring in 2026.

4

Make your intake forms keyboard-navigable. Forget the overlay for a moment — can someone fill out your contact form using only a keyboard (Tab to move between fields, Enter to submit)? Test it yourself right now. If not, that's a fix that costs your developer 30 minutes and helps every visitor, not just those with disabilities.

Is your firm using AudioEye?

Claim your firm profile to verify your tech stack and access premium competitive intelligence. Not listed yet? Apply to get added.

Find Your Firm → Apply to Get Listed →

Top Firms Using AudioEye by sophistication index

#	Firm	Segment	Attorneys	SI Score	Grade
1	Aljouny Injury Law ajlounyinjurylaw.com	Awareness Leaders	9	82.582	A+
2	B A L \| Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP bal.com	Retention Innovators	1	82.582	A+
3	axley.com axley.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	3	82.582	A+
4	Acrisure acrisure.com	Retention Innovators	1	82.582	A+
5	Joubert Law Firm joubertlawfirm.com	Retention Innovators	15	82.382	A+
6	Leonard Law Group LLC leonardlawgroup.net	Retention Innovators	1	81.582	A+
7	thecountrylawyer.com thecountrylawyer.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	13	81.582	A+
8	Mwg Aaa mwg.aaa.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	1	81.582	A+
9	Alvandi Law Group, P.C. alvandigroup.com	Retention Innovators	33	81.582	A+
10	Owen Patterson & Owen opolaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	1	81.081	A+
11	Action Law Group actionlawgroup.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	1	77.377	A
12	hilliard-law.com hilliard-law.com	Basic Tech Adopters	33	76.076	A
13	Pothitakis Law Firm pothitakislaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	5	74.074	A
14	Harmonson Law Firm clarkharmonsonattorney.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	33	74.074	A
15	Padilla Law Group padillalawgroup.com	Basic Tech Adopters	25	73.073	A
16	Powell, Jackman, Stevens & Ricciardi your-advocates.org	Retention Innovators	1	73.073	A
17	The Tadda Law Firm taddalaw.com	Basic Tech Adopters	4	73.073	A
18	Woodmenlife woodmenlife.org	Basic Tech Adopters	1	72.873	A
19	barrettlawllc.com barrettlawllc.com	Basic Tech Adopters	9	72.873	A
20	Law Offices of Ruben Ortiz rubenortizlaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	1	72.072	A

See all 535 firms →