How many law firms use Bing Ads?

684 personal injury law firms use Bing Ads, representing 1.9% adoption across the PI legal market. Firms using Bing Ads average a 67.7 Sophistication Index score, +39.8 points above non-adopters.

Why do law firms use Bing Ads?

Bing Ads is a Analytics tool. Personal injury law firms adopt Bing Ads to improve their technology stack and competitive position in the PI legal market.

Which law firms use Bing Ads?

Top personal injury law firms using Bing Ads include Kogan & DiSalvo, P.A., Mike Morse Law Firm & Carter Mario Law Firm. These firms are ranked by technology sophistication across 37,000+ PI firms nationally.

Bing Ads for Law Firms — 684 PI Firms (1.9% Adoption)

What is Bing Ads?

Bing Ads (Microsoft Advertising) UET tag tracks website conversions from Microsoft's search advertising platform. Bing captures roughly 6-8% of search traffic, often at a lower cost-per-click than Google Ads for legal keywords.

Common Use Cases for Law Firms

Track conversions from Bing search ads at lower cost-per-click than Google
Reach an older demographic that over-indexes on Bing (relevant for estate planning, elder law)
Import Google Ads campaigns to Bing with one click for incremental reach
Target LinkedIn profile audiences through Microsoft's integration
Capture leads from voice search queries via Cortana and Bing

How We Detect It

UET tag via GTM Direct JavaScript embed Automatic import from Google Ads

Market Overview

Among personal injury law firms, Bing Ads has been adopted by 684 firms (1.9% adoption rate) as a analytics solution. Adopters score 67.7 SI on average, +39.8 points higher than firms without it, suggesting Bing Ads correlates with broader technology investment. The heaviest adoption comes from the Conversion-Focused Firms segment (6.3%), followed by Basic Tech Adopters (2.1%). The most common co-occurring tools are Google Analytics (found on 86.4% of Bing Ads adopters) and WordPress (74.6%).

684 Firms Using

1.9% Adoption Rate

67.7 Avg Adopter SI

+39.8 SI Lift vs Non-Adopters

Get connected

Request an introduction from Top Dog Law — we'll make the connection on your behalf.

Adoption by State

ME —

VT —

NH —

WA —

MT —

ND —

MN —

WI —

MI —

NY —

MA —

RI —

OR —

ID —

WY —

SD —

IA —

IL —

IN —

OH —

PA —

NJ —

CT —

CA —

NV —

CO —

NE —

MO —

KY —

WV —

VA —

MD —

DE —

DC —

AZ —

UT —

KS —

AR —

TN —

NC —

SC —

NM —

OK —

LA —

MS —

AL —

GA —

AK —

HI —

TX —

FL —

0

—

Bing Ads Best Practices

1

Import your Google Ads campaigns to Bing via the one-click import tool, but then tune the bids separately. Microsoft Advertising's import feature will pull in your entire Google Ads structure in under 5 minutes. The mistake is treating Bing as a set-it-and-forget-it clone. Bing's auction dynamics are different — legal CPCs on Bing run $20-80 vs. $80-300 on Google for the same keywords, and the conversion rates are comparable on high-intent queries. Reduce imported bids by 40% initially, then optimize from there based on actual conversion data.

2

Layer in LinkedIn Profile targeting for employment and workers' comp practices. Microsoft Advertising's unique advantage is its integration with LinkedIn profile data. You can target ads based on job title, industry, and company size — capabilities Google Ads simply doesn't have. For PI firms with a workers' comp or employment law component, this unlocks a targeting vector worth testing: HR managers in manufacturing companies, warehouse workers in specific zip codes, construction industry employees. Set up a separate campaign specifically to test this; don't muddy your standard search campaign data.

3

Set up UET (Universal Event Tracking) with value-assigned conversion goals before spending a dollar. The Bing UET tag is equivalent to Google's gtag — it fires conversion events back to Microsoft Advertising for optimization. Most firms install it but never assign conversion values. Assign $5,000 as a nominal value to a consultation booking, $500 to a form submission, $100 to a phone click. This allows Microsoft's bidding algorithm to optimize for high-value conversions, not just any click that hit the site.

4

Bid aggressively on competitor brand keywords — Bing's trademark policies are more permissive than Google's. Microsoft Advertising allows broader use of competitor brand names in ad copy with fewer restrictions than Google Ads. For PI firms in competitive markets, a campaign targeting the exact names of the top 5 competitor firms can intercept high-intent searches from people who are comparison-shopping. The CPCs are usually a fraction of what you'd pay for generic "car accident attorney" keywords.

5

Run Bing separately from Google in budget planning, not as a percentage spillover. The most common mistake with Bing is allocating 10% of the Google Ads budget as an afterthought. This starves Bing of the data it needs to optimize and produces inconclusive results. Run a proper 90-day test with a dedicated Bing budget of $1,500-3,000/month, track cost-per-signed-case the same way you track Google, and make the budget allocation decision from real data.

Alternatives to Bing Ads

1

Google Ads — The only real competitor at scale. Google holds 92%+ of search market share, and for PI keywords, the volume isn't close — Bing might generate 6-8% of the search volume Google does for "car accident attorney [city]." Google's auction depth means more competition, higher CPCs ($150-300+ for top PI keywords), and more sophisticated bidding strategies. Bing wins on efficiency; Google wins on volume. You need both if you're serious about paid search coverage.

2

Local Services Ads (Google LSA) — Not technically a Bing alternative, but many firms add Bing to their mix when they've maxed out LSA budgets. LSA costs $50-150 per verified lead on a pay-per-lead model and comes with Google's "Google Screened" badge. If you haven't fully optimized LSA before adding Bing, start there — the CPL economics are often better and the trust signal is stronger.

3

Yelp Advertising — Relevant for small PI firms in markets where Yelp has strong local search presence. Yelp ads target high-intent local searchers at CPCs lower than Google, but the traffic volume is thin for legal queries. Bing offers more query diversity and targeting sophistication. Yelp is worth testing with $500/month; it's not a strategic replacement for Bing.

4

Apple Search Ads — Not yet widely used in legal, but Apple's search has grown to meaningful share as Siri queries and Spotlight searches increase. Legal CPCs are a fraction of Google's because the auction is underpopulated. The demographic skews iOS users — Apple users over-index on higher income and education, which correlates with higher-value cases. Worth a $500/month test in 2025-2026 while it's still cheap.

Bing Ads Power Moves

1

Use Bing's In-Market Audience for "Legal Services" layered on top of keyword targeting to improve Quality Score. Microsoft Advertising's In-Market Audiences are users Microsoft has identified as actively researching or comparing options in a category. Layer the Legal Services in-market audience onto your search campaigns as a bid modifier (+20-30%) rather than a targeting restriction. This boosts bids for visitors already in research mode without narrowing your reach.

2

Check Bing's search term report for queries that convert on Bing but get zero volume on Google. Because Bing's user base over-indexes on older demographics and voice search (Cortana), the query phrasing is often different from Google. Common finds: full-sentence queries ("what do I do if I was in a car accident and it wasn't my fault"), questions about specific injury types, and hyper-local queries with neighborhood names. These queries convert at high rates on Bing and often represent SEO content opportunities nobody else has written about.

3

Run Bing-specific ad copy that mentions "no fee unless you win" more prominently than your Google ads. Bing's demographic skews older and more financially conservative. A/B test ad copy that leads with the contingency fee guarantee against copy that leads with case results. In Bing split tests at PI firms, fee-first copy typically outperforms results-first copy by 15-25% in CTR — the inverse of what works on Google, where results and credibility signals dominate. Treat them as different audiences.

4

Set up automated rules in Bing to pause keywords when Google Ads is also running them at full spend. When your Google Ads daily budget is exhausted (a common afternoon occurrence for high-spend PI firms), Bing can serve as a backup channel. Configure Microsoft Advertising's automated rules to increase Bing budgets by 30% after 3pm on days when Google exhausts its budget. This requires monitoring both platforms' budget pacing, but it captures searches that would otherwise go uncontested.

Is your firm using Bing Ads?

Claim your firm profile to verify your tech stack and access premium competitive intelligence. Not listed yet? Apply to get added.

Find Your Firm → Apply to Get Listed →

Top Firms Using Bing Ads by sophistication index

#	Firm	Segment	Attorneys	SI Score	Grade
1	Kogan & DiSalvo, P.A. kogan-disalvo.com	Retention Innovators	12	95.896	A+
2	Mike Morse Law Firm 855mikewins.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	356	95.095	A+
3	Carter Mario Law Firm cartermario.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	1	95.095	A+
4	Frankl Kominsky Injury Lawyers fklegal.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	95	95.095	A+
5	Stone Rose Law stoneroselaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	13	94.895	A+
6	DiPasquale Moore dmlawusa.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	31	94.895	A+
7	Omega Law Group Injury & Accident Attorneys omegalaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	132	94.695	A+
8	Franklin D. Azar & Associates fdazar.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	59	94.094	A+
9	Geiger Legal Group geiger-legal.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	13	94.094	A+
10	Martin, Harding & Mazzotti Llp. 1800law1010.com	Retention Innovators	23	94.094	A+
11	Steinger, Greene & Feiner injurylawyers.com	Retention Innovators	1	94.094	A+
12	stoneinjurylawyers.com stoneinjurylawyers.com	Retention Innovators	14	94.094	A+
13	Peterson Law Office justinpetersonlaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	4	94.094	A+
14	Taylor King Law taylorkinglaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	2	93.894	A+
15	pmlawfla.com pmlawfla.com	Retention Innovators	40	93.894	A+
16	Napoli Shkolnik PLLC napolilaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	147	93.894	A+
17	The Eichholz Law Firm thejusticelawyer.com	Retention Innovators	9	93.894	A+
18	Fuicelli & Lee coloradoinjurylaw.com	Conversion-Focused Firms	1	93.894	A+
19	Intermountain Legal intermountainlegal.net	Conversion-Focused Firms	1	93.894	A+
20	TorkLaw torklaw.com	Retention Innovators	63	93.093	A+

See all 684 firms →