0.1%
of PI firms
49
adopters

Clio

Clio, founded in 2008 by Jack Newton and Rian Gauvreau in Vancouver, BC, is the dominant cloud-based legal practice management platform — the Salesforce of the legal profession. Th…

Category Case Management SI Lift +19.8 pts clio.com
Visit Site →

What is Clio?

Clio, founded in 2008 by Jack Newton and Rian Gauvreau in Vancouver, BC, is the dominant cloud-based legal practice management platform — the Salesforce of the legal profession. The company has raised over $900M in venture funding (including a $900M Series F in 2021 at a $3B+ valuation led by TCV and JMI Equity), serves 150,000+ legal professionals across 100+ countries, and processes over $20 billion in legal payments annually. Clio's product suite spans the full practice lifecycle: Clio Manage ($39-$109/user/month) handles case management, time tracking, billing, and document management; Clio Grow ($49+/user/month) adds CRM, intake automation, and pipeline management; and Clio Draft (launched 2024) brings AI-powered document drafting. The 250+ integration marketplace connects Clio to virtually every tool a law firm uses — from CallRail to QuickBooks to LawPay. Clio's annual Legal Trends Report, drawing on aggregated and anonymized data from its user base, has become the legal industry's most cited benchmark for utilization rates, billing realization, and technology adoption. For PI firms specifically, Clio's contingency fee tracking, trust accounting compliance (IOLTA), and client portal capabilities make it the default recommendation from consultants, bar associations, and legal technology publications. The lock-in risk is real but different from proprietary platforms like Scorpion: Clio stores your data and you can export it, but migrating 3 years of case history, documents, and workflows to a competitor is a 2-6 month project that most firms never undertake.

Common Use Cases for Law Firms

  • Manage the full lifecycle of PI cases from intake through settlement
  • Track billable time and generate invoices with legal-specific billing codes
  • Store and organize case documents with version control and client portal access
  • Automate client intake with Clio Grow's online intake forms and scheduling
  • Run practice analytics to identify most profitable case types and referral sources

How We Detect It

Detected via Clio Grow intake forms on website DNS CNAME for Clio-hosted client portals JavaScript widget for intake and scheduling
Market Overview

Among personal injury law firms, Clio has been adopted by 49 firms (0.1% adoption rate) as a case management solution. Firms using Clio average a 48.4 Sophistication Index, +19.8 points above non-adopters — a meaningful signal of technology-forward operations. The heaviest adoption comes from the Retention Innovators segment (1.2%), followed by Basic Tech Adopters (0.1%). Firms running Clio most commonly pair it with WordPress (63.3%) and Microsoft 365 (63.3%).

Clio Quick Facts

Company
Market
Category CRM & Case Management
Subcategory Legal Practice Management
Pricing Subscription from $39/user/month (billed annually)
Competitors PracticePanther, MyCase, Smokeball
Trend ▲ Growing
250+ Integrations
99.9% Uptime Guarantee
300+ App integrations for case sync
Why PI Firms Use Clio

PI firms use Clio to streamline client intake from marketing-heavy websites via custom forms and online scheduling, converting leads from car accident or slip-and-fall ads into managed cases. It handles case tracking for medical malpractice claims, automates billing for contingency fees, and provides client portals for updates, reducing manual operations and improving conversion from website visitors to signed retainers. Integrations with payment tools speed up collections, supporting cash flow for small PI practices.

Sources: clio.com/manage/ softwareadvice.com/legal/clio-le... youtube.com/watch?v=mNRApfdx2As nysba.org/wp-content/uploads/202...
49 Firms Using
0.1% Adoption Rate
48.4 Avg Adopter SI
+19.8 SI Lift vs Non-Adopters

Get connected

Request an introduction from Top Dog Law — we'll make the connection on your behalf.

Adoption by State
ME —
VT —
NH —
WA —
MT —
ND —
MN —
WI —
MI —
NY —
MA —
RI —
OR —
ID —
WY —
SD —
IA —
IL —
IN —
OH —
PA —
NJ —
CT —
CA —
NV —
CO —
NE —
MO —
KY —
WV —
VA —
MD —
DE —
DC —
AZ —
UT —
KS —
AR —
TN —
NC —
SC —
NM —
OK —
LA —
MS —
AL —
GA —
AK —
HI —
TX —
FL —
0
—
Adoption by Segment which segments use Clio most
Commonly Paired With co-occurrence

Clio Best Practices

1
Set up Clio Grow intake forms on your website and connect them to your case pipeline on day one. Most firms buy Clio Manage for case management but never set up Clio Grow's intake forms — instead they collect leads through separate form plugins and manually enter them into Clio. This creates a leaky handoff where leads fall through the cracks. Clio Grow's embedded intake form creates a contact record automatically, assigns it to a pipeline stage, and triggers notification emails. The firm that responds to an inquiry in 5 minutes (Clio automation) signs the case; the firm that responds in 3 hours (manual data entry from a Gmail notification) doesn't.
2
Configure custom matter fields for PI-specific data: accident date, injury type, insurance carrier, and policy limits. Clio's default matter fields are generic (designed for all practice areas). For PI, create custom fields that capture the data your attorneys actually need: date of accident, statute of limitations deadline, injury severity, insurance carrier name, policy limits, medical provider names, and lien amounts. This turns each matter into a structured record that's searchable, reportable, and actionable — not just a folder of documents with notes scattered in the activity feed.
3
Use Clio's task templates to standardize your case workflow from intake to settlement. Create a task template for each case type (auto accident, slip and fall, medical malpractice) with every step pre-populated: send engagement letter → request police report → obtain medical records → send demand letter → etc. When a new case is created, apply the template and every task is assigned, deadlines are set, and nothing gets forgotten. This is how 5-attorney firms manage 200+ active cases without dropping balls.
4
Set up the Clio + LawPay integration to accept payments through your client portal. Clients pay faster when payment is frictionless. The Clio + LawPay integration lets you generate an invoice in Clio, send it through the client portal, and collect payment via credit card or bank transfer — all without leaving Clio. For PI firms on contingency, this is most relevant for cost advances, consultation fees (for non-contingency case types), and settlement disbursement accounting. The integration also handles trust accounting compliance automatically, which is critical for firms subject to IOLTA rules.
5
Run Clio's "Utilization Rate" and "Collection Rate" reports monthly — these two numbers tell you more than any other metric. Utilization rate (billable hours ÷ available hours) reveals whether attorneys are spending their time on billable work or drowning in admin. Collection rate (collected revenue ÷ billed revenue) reveals whether the firm's billing is actually converting to cash. Clio's Legal Trends Report consistently shows industry averages of ~31% utilization and ~86% collection. If your numbers are below these benchmarks, the problem isn't marketing (more leads won't help) — it's operational efficiency. Fix the leak before adding more water.

Alternatives to Clio

1
MyCase — A more affordable, easier-to-learn alternative that's popular with solo and small firms (2-10 attorneys). MyCase's client portal is arguably better than Clio's for client communication — secure messaging, document sharing, and payment collection in a clean, consumer-friendly interface. MyCase costs $39-89/user/month with fewer feature gates than Clio. The trade-off: smaller integration marketplace, less sophisticated reporting, and fewer enterprise features. If your firm has under 5 attorneys and your needs are straightforward, MyCase may be the better fit.
2
Filevine — The power user's choice, especially popular with PI and mass tort firms. Filevine treats cases as configurable projects with custom phases, fields, and automations. Its document automation and deadline tracking are more granular than Clio's. Filevine's learning curve is steeper, but firms that invest in configuration often find it more flexible for complex PI workflows (multi-defendant, subrogation, stacking liens). Pricing is custom and typically higher than Clio for comparable seat counts.
3
PracticePanther — A mid-market option known for ease of use and strong billing features. PracticePanther's flat-rate pricing ($59-89/user/month, all features included) avoids Clio's tier-gating problem where you need the expensive plan for basic CRM functionality. Good for firms that are tired of being upsold and want predictable costs. The integration ecosystem is smaller than Clio's but covers the essentials (LawPay, QuickBooks, Zapier).
4
Litify — Built natively on Salesforce, Litify is the enterprise option for firms with 25+ attorneys or high-volume operations that need Salesforce's CRM depth. Litify's business intelligence dashboards, custom workflow automation, and Salesforce ecosystem access (Pardot, Tableau, custom Apex code) are unmatched. But the complexity and cost (custom pricing, typically $150+/user/month plus implementation) put it out of reach for most PI firms. Best for firms processing 100+ new cases per month that have outgrown Clio's reporting capabilities.

Clio Power Moves

1
Use Clio's Zapier integration to create a case record automatically from any lead source. Connect Clio to Zapier and set up "Zaps" that create Clio contacts from: Google Ads lead form submissions, CallRail call completions, Gravity Forms entries, or even Slack channel messages. This eliminates manual data entry and ensures every lead, from every source, gets into Clio's pipeline immediately. A Zapier Professional subscription ($49/month) connected to 5-6 lead sources saves your intake team hours per week and eliminates the "I forgot to enter that lead" problem entirely.
2
Set up automated text and email reminders for upcoming statute of limitations deadlines. In Clio, create a custom date field for "Statute of Limitations Date" on every PI matter. Use Clio's automation rules (or a Zapier connection) to trigger reminder emails at 120 days, 60 days, and 30 days before the deadline. Missing a statute of limitations is a malpractice claim. Automating the reminder chain is the cheapest malpractice insurance you can buy — and it costs nothing beyond the Clio subscription you're already paying for.
3
Use Clio's client portal to eliminate 80% of "where's my case?" phone calls. Configure the client portal to show clients their matter status, upcoming tasks, recent documents, and messages from their attorney. PI clients call frequently because they're anxious and have no visibility. A well-configured portal gives them a dashboard that answers their top 3 questions ("Is anything happening?" "What's next?" "When will I hear back?") without burning paralegal time on status update calls. Firms that activate the client portal report 40-60% fewer inbound "status check" calls.
4
Connect Clio to your accounting software (QuickBooks or Xero) to eliminate double-entry of financial data. Clio's native QuickBooks integration syncs invoices, payments, and trust transactions bidirectionally. Without it, your bookkeeper manually re-enters every invoice and payment — introducing errors and delays. With it, an invoice created in Clio appears in QuickBooks automatically, and a payment recorded in QuickBooks updates the Clio matter. This is especially critical for trust accounting, where manual reconciliation errors create compliance risk.
5
Export your Clio data annually and store it offline as a disaster recovery measure. Clio is cloud-hosted — your data lives on Clio's servers (AWS infrastructure). While Clio has strong uptime and security, the firm that relies solely on a SaaS vendor's continuity is the firm that panics during a service outage. Export your matters, contacts, and documents annually using Clio's bulk export feature and store them on an encrypted external drive or secure cloud backup. This also protects you if Clio changes pricing, terms, or features in ways that force a migration — you'll have your data ready to move.

Is your firm using Clio?

Claim your firm profile to verify your tech stack and access premium competitive intelligence. Not listed yet? Apply to get added.

Find Your Firm → Apply to Get Listed →
Top Firms Using Clio by sophistication index
# Firm Segment Attorneys SI Score Grade
1 Intermountain Legal intermountainlegal.net Conversion-Focused Firms 1 93.894 A+
2 Marcus & Mack marcusandmack.com Retention Innovators 29 92.092 A+
3 Mandelbaum Barrett, P.C. mblawfirm.com Basic Tech Adopters 1 92.092 A+
4 Puget Law Group pugetlawgroup.com Conversion-Focused Firms 15 90.090 A+
5 Joshua Graham Trial Lawyers joshuagraham.com Conversion-Focused Firms 1 88.588 A+
6 Protection LAW Group Llp. protectionlawgroup.com Retention Innovators 38 78.378 A
7 Roybal-Mack & Cordova roybalmacklaw.com Basic Tech Adopters 1 72.372 A
8 Mcvlaw mcvlaw.com Basic Tech Adopters 1 71.071 A
9 Leddy Law Firm leddylaw.com Retention Innovators 3 67.568 A-
10 ccplawyers.com ccplawyers.com Basic Tech Adopters 5 64.564 A-
11 Kegan Coleman Law Firm PLLC kegancolemanlawfirm.com Retention Innovators 1 60.560 B+
12 kemethuntlaw.com kemethuntlaw.com Basic Tech Adopters 2 60.560 B+
13 Caffarelli & Siegel Ltd. cslaw.com Retention Innovators 1 59.560 B+
14 Siri & Glimstad, LLP sirillp.com Awareness-Only Firms 1 57.057 B+
15 Foreman Friedman, PA fflegal.com Awareness Leaders 1 54.554 B+
16 Gette Law PLLC gettelaw.com Basic Tech Adopters 1 53.554 B+
17 Guerrero Law Firm guerrerolaw.net Retention Innovators 1 53.554 B+
18 Tran Law Firm, PLLC tranlawfirmpllc.com Basic Tech Adopters 11 53.053 B+
19 Meneses Law meneses.law Awareness Leaders 1 52.052 B+
20 Previant, Goldberg, Uelmen, Gratz, Miller & Brueggeman, S.c. previant.com Basic Tech Adopters 14 52.052 B+
See all 49 firms →
Jax
Jax Technology Analyst Top Law Dog